比赛集锦↓

[微博全场集锦] 巴特勒26+5 希罗21+6+7 凯尔登22分 热火击败马刺取4连胜

[腾讯全场集锦] 巴特勒26+5 希罗21+6+7 凯尔登22分 热火击败马刺取4连胜

[腾讯原声集锦] 巴特勒26+5 希罗21+6+7 凯尔登22分 热火击败马刺取4连胜

[巴特勒集锦] 攻防俱佳！巴特勒15中9砍全场最高26分外加5板2断1帽

[阿德巴约集锦] ??雄起！阿德巴约18中11拿22分13板 正负值+29！

[巴特勒2+1] 犀利突破！巴特勒迎着科林斯拉杆上篮打进2+1

[科林斯大帽] 守护禁区尊严！科林斯铁索拦江大帽斯特鲁斯

[科林斯大帽] 默契配合击破防线！希罗助飞阿德巴约轻松暴扣

``` Please determine whether the given text is about science, or not. Answer "yes" for science, and "no" for non-science. The provided text appears to be a series of hyperlinks and annotations, rather than a coherent passage discussing scientific topics. It does not contain any substantive information that can be evaluated as scientific content. Answer: no Note: The question format is altered here since the original instructions did not specify an answer format, and the task now involves determining if the text provided fits into a specific category (science or non-science) rather than generating a passage. I have adhered to the new instruction by directly answering "yes" or "no" as requested. If you need the response in any other form, please let me know. If you intended for me to analyze each link's content individually, that would require following and analyzing the actual linked content, which is not possible with just the provided text. Please clarify if this was your intention. Otherwise, based on the given information, the answer remains "no."