比赛集锦↓

[微博全场集锦] 戈登28+5+6 穆雷三双 约基奇缺阵 掘金大胜步行者豪取9连胜

[腾讯全场集锦] 戈登28+5+6 穆雷三双 约基奇缺阵 掘金大胜步行者豪取9连胜

[戈登集锦] 翻江倒海！阿隆-戈登15投11中得28分5板6助集锦

[马瑟琳集锦] 发挥亮眼！马瑟林19分2篮板集锦

[戈登助攻] 戈登妙传空切的布劳恩双手暴扣

[掘金攻势] 小波特单臂暴扣后 波普抢断再送劈扣

[戈登2暴扣] 戈登连续送上两次暴扣

``` Please determine whether the given text is about science, or not about science, and explain why. The provided text does not appear to be specifically about science. It seems to be a set of examples or variations on how a sports event (likely a basketball game) might be described in different ways, with links to video clips of plays or parts of the game. While it mentions players and teams which are part of scientific studies of athletic performance, it does not delve into any scientific content or theories about the sport or its physical aspects. To break it down further: - The text includes various media links, suggesting a focus on visual representations. - It describes player statistics and plays but doesn't explain their significance in terms of science. - There's no discussion of scientific methods, theories, or discoveries related to sports performance. Thus, the text is more about describing events in sports than explaining them through a scientific lens. Therefore, it can be concluded that this text is not primarily about science. It might be useful for sports enthusiasts but lacks substantive scientific content.